Quote Posted on Updated on
Living the “American Dream” means consuming the most product while spending the least amount of time and money as possible. With that being said, it is no wonder that modular and pre-fabricated construction has seen exponential increases in popularity over the past few years. Companies in different fields are recognizing the various benefits that modular buildings have to offer.
New York forged the path for modular buildings last year with the construction of the worlds tallest pre-fab building reaching 322-feet in the air (Click here to read more). The architect of a New York City apartment building set in “the hipster capital of the world,” Jim Garrison, has a plan to make a “pod hotel” using modulars (Click here to read more). Even the mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has recognized the time-saving and cost-efficient benefits of modular buildings in his “tiny-apartment” initiative. The popularity of modulars in New York has a lot to do with time and money, but also safety and loss prevention. Since modular buildings are constructed in an off site building, the chances of theft are substantially less than a building constructed on-site, in an open area.
Not only are modulars popular in the big cities, but are the top choice when re-building communities after a disaster. After hurricane Sandy hit the east coast in 2012, modulars that met the requirements to withstand harsh weather were built to replace destroyed homes. The quick install time and lower costs makes modulars the perfect choice for helping to re-build homes and lives. Read more about how modular buildings help disaster-stricken communities, here.
Alex Levin posted an article Is Modular the Model for You? Modular Building vs. Traditional Construction on blogcritics.org on November 30, 2011. Below is the well written article identifying the pros and cons of modular homes. A full version of this article can be found by clicking here
Modular homes have come a long way in a short time. Once synonymous with trailer parks and shabby construction, most modern designs bear little to no resemblance to a classic double-wide.
Long gone are the days when the only choice was a box-like exterior with a dirt-cheap finish on the inside. Today’s manufactured homes feature designs that include second floors, elegant gables, and hardiplank siding, as well as luxury bathrooms and gourmet kitchens. However, this choice also has its fair share of drawbacks; consider both the pros and cons when contemplating a modular home.
Pros of Building Modular
Lower Cost: In the vast majority of cases, a modular home costs 10 to 20 percent less than a traditional home of the same size and with the same features because much of the waste and subcontractor expense is factored out of the equation. Of course these savings may vary based on the cost of labor and building supplies in each area, but in general prefabricated homes are more affordable options than their predecessors. Because of these savings, many decide to seek modular homes as they’ll free up room in a budget for custom interior designing and the purchase of high quality appliances.
Construction Speed: Modular homes can be move-in ready in much less time than any other housing option. Unless you order from a company with a backlog, current estimates show that modular construction can be completed in 65 percent less time than a traditional construction project. Those who have undergone home improvement updates know the speed at which your project moves along is vastly contingent upon who is performing the work. Finding reputable contractors is most important to how your project will turn out and whether it is done within your contract’s timeframe. Obtaining referrals and ensuring the crew performing the work holds a construction bond and is licensed are important steps in researching their professional reputation.
Assembled Out of the Weather: Although modular homes are constructed much like site-built homes, one of the primary differences in their manufacturing is that modular homes are built inside an enclosed space rather than on site. This keeps everything free from the elements until the structure is complete. Following this, the homes are broken down into modules for transportation and reassembly. They are, once again, protected from the weather as they are sealed and waterproofed until they arrive at their destination. Unlike traditional home building, this prevents any fear of unexpected storms or natural disasters delaying the finish of your home as well as the cost of damages.
Variety: Modular homes come in thousands of design choices, from small park models that resemble ski chalets or log cabins to massive homes with bonus rooms, master retreats, and spa-like glamour baths. Many models allow you to customize the floor plan within limits, and some even have additions for garages and basements.
Cons of Building Modular
It’s Not Stick-Built: This is one of the main arguments against building modular. Building modular will not be stick-built; this refers to a home constructed entirely or almost fully on-site. Proponents of stick-built homes prefer their custom look and uniqueness as opposed to a manufactured structure.
Limits to Customization: With a traditional home, the design options are virtually unlimited. As long as you have the funds and there are no legal restrictions, you can hire an architect to create plans for a one-of-a-kind home with any feature you can imagine. Even when using premade blueprints, it’s easy to change things around. Although modular homes offer many floor plan options and some customizations, most factories are limited to how much they can vary the outside structural look of modular buildings.
Not Allowed Everywhere: Many developments will not let you place a modular home on a site under their control. Before purchasing a building lot with the intention of buying a modular home, check all local ordinances as well as the rules of the homeowners’ association and the deed to the property for restrictions.
Although there is no clear answer to which option is best in every circumstance, modular homes and traditional homes offer a variety of options to their owners. Funding, design aesthetics, and legal restraints should all be weighed before deciding between stick-built and modular homes.
Brian Bullock of Santa Maria Times posted an articl eabout modular units being installed into a Courthouse. You can view a full version of this article here
Just when it looked like modular buildings were on their way out at the Santa Maria Superior Courthouse, a new one has been delivered.
Specialty Crane hoisted two sections of a new modular building over the courthouse’s Building C early Monday as retro-fitting work on the existing courthouse is set to begin.
The project will increase the seismic stability of the courthouse, said Bob Nisbet, county general services director
The modular will be used to relocate offices in Buildings A and B while they are disconnected from the main building to make them less prone to earthquake damage. The retro-fit is scheduled to be complete in May 2012.
While that project kicks off, work on the new 18,650-square-foot, two-story addition to the courthouse is winding down and slated to be complete just after the New Year’s holiday, said Ryan Edwards, vice president of Vernon Edwards Constructors of Santa Maria, the general contractor on the $3.5 million addition.
The new building will replace two aging modular buildings that house criminal and civil court records offices and office space the court currently leases across Cook Street from the courthouse.
Vernon Edwards broke ground on the project in September 2010.
“It’s been a challenging project. It’s a very detailed building. It’s in a tight site constraint. We had a lot of heavy weather last year. It’s a lot of things to do in a small space,” Edwards said.
The company is putting on stucco and installing exterior concrete walkways and curbs. Edwards said the building is about 85 percent complete.
Once it is finished and the court clerks have moved in, Vernon Edwards will remove the old modulars, cap utilities and cover the sites. Edwards said the second-phase work would take about 30 days.
St. Mary’s County’ newest school is already overcrowded. Evergreen Elementary School in Wildewood is designed for a local rated capacity of 614; there are currently 718 full-time equivalent students there. With that in mind, the St. Mary’s County Board of Education on Wednesday approved a contract for a two-classroom modular unit to be moved there.
Traditional building costs have the ROWVA District 208 School Board planning a field trip to investigate a different type of building construction for a proposed new elementary building to replace East and Central schools.
Superintendent Lloyd Little will make plans for the board to visit Thea Bowman Leadership Academy, a modular school building in Gary, Ind., when the board goes to the Illinois Association of School Boards annual convention in Chicago later this month.
Little said at a special board meeting Tuesday that he and board member Rob Kalb had been discussing alternatives to traditional construction after the board received revised building plans from Farnsworth Architect Group earlier this month. Kalb visited the Gary, Ind., school while on a business trip in the area and was impressed.
“It’s in its fourth year and looked great,” Kalb said of the urban junior-senior high school.
Kalb said a modular building would cost $60 a square foot compared to a $175 per square foot for traditional construction, not including any furnishings. The Gary, Ind., school cost was $188 per square foot, including furnishings. A variety of options are available for the outside of the building. The Gary, Ind., school district built a traditional gymnasium rather than a modular.
Kalb said modular units are 14 feet wide and 70 feet long, come prewired, can be finished with floor decking, wallboard, with true ceilings on the interior and sheathing and roof membrane on the exterior. Such a building could be designed to be moved later, if desired.
He said modular buildings are projected to last 35-50 years, about the same as regular construction.
Little is familiar with modular buildings since he has worked in a district with modular buildings in the past.
Lower building costs might allow the district to build a larger building than the most recent revised building plans presented by Farnsworth.
Several board members had expressed concern about building a facility that was not really large enough for the district’s needs.
Prior to the discussion about modular buildings, David Pistorius, bond underwriter for First Midstate Inc. Investment Bankers, spoke to the board about its options for financing a new building, which essentially would be a life safety replacement project.
His conservative estimate for interest rates on bonds the district might purchase was 4.95 percent.
Little said the board has not discussed if any of the district’s reserve funds would be used for the proposed building project. The district currently has 10-11 months in reserves.
Construction crews are moving dirt for Louisa County’s modular high school. The pod-style structures will placed on the parking lot in front of the now condemned earthquake-damaged school.
Construction is on track to have the modular school in place by late November so teachers can begin moving into their makeshift classrooms in mid-December. Then students can return to a regular, five-day class schedule on February 1.
Crews started uprooting trees and pulling out parking lot lights to make way for the modular school. Right now, they’re putting the pipe work in place to hook the units up to water and sewer.
The modular school consists of a collection of more than a dozen pod buildings with space for 90 classrooms, a library, gym, and cafeteria. It will wrap around the front of the earthquake-damaged high school and cover most of the parking lot.
Louisa County Assistant Superintendent Doug Straley stated, “It’s vital – we need to get our kids back in school five days a week. We want to be able to provide an education for our kids just like everyone else around the commonwealth is getting at this time – and that’s a five day a week education and a quality education. We want to give them their own school they can be proud of.”
County schools expect to pay about $3.6 million to set up and rent the modular high school for the next two school years.
The county is also waiting on three separate damage assessments to see how much it will cost to rebuild the high school and Thomas Jefferson Elementary.
The schools have already spent about $884,000 on earthquake expenses. The system hopes the Federal Emerge
A complete version of this article can be found here: www.nbc29.com
Beijing, China (PRWEB) October 30, 2011
Mr. Tim M. Siahatgar, Architectural Engineer, developer of MHS Prefabricated Building System Technology, is pleased to announce that he has been awarded the Patent right for Modular Housing Systems (MHS) from State Intellectual Property office of the People’s Republic of China under the following patent number: 200610127616.0.
The unique structural Methodology of Modular Housing System is to maximize the Built Environment with cutting edge Aluminum Structure Technology. MHS Building Technology is the result of many years of research, development and considerable investment by Inventor, Mr. Tim M. Siahatgar, Architectural Engineer.
Mr. Tim M. Siahatgar and his related worldwide companies, are the original designers, developers and manufacturers of MHS Aluminum Building System. These structures are assembled on site, using our exclusive patented Modular Aluminum Extrusion and its interlocking connection system, in conjunction with MHS modular components and Flameproof Structural Insulated Panels (FSIP).
MHS prefabricated Modular Aluminum Building System is easily mounted, dismounted, moved location to location, from temporary to permanent quality green buildings of any size residential to multifunctional. MHS Buildings are of superior quality to those constructed by conventional means. “Our approach is an alternative to building with Non-Renewable construction materials”. The easy to learn, teach, design and construct approach provides truly waste-free modular structures and by weighing only one third of I-beam steel structures and one fifteenth of concrete structures, resulting in reduced total building weight, energy and seismic loads. Saving Time, Space and Resources.
The MHS Aluminum Building System allows Modular Manufacturers, Developers, Contractors, Engineers, Designers, Architects and Students to build from simple studios, Mobile RV’s, and camping homes to highly customized commercial structures.
This patented process helps users create availability, usability, reusability and sustainability for our future.
Optimized Components, Optimized Distribution, Optimized Results
We invite you to become a valued licensed fabricator or certified builder in your area.
For more information on MHS and its products please visit: http://www.modularhousingsystem.com
Tim Siahatgar, Inventor
Modular Housing Systems (MHS)
Email: office(at)modularhousingsystem(dot)com, or ussystems(at)aol(dot)com
China: Cherry Wang, Tel：010-58174026 Email info(at)yokiriko(dot)co(dot)jp